반응형

the termination of negotiations on a labor contract

The lifting of the labor contract is the disposal of the rights that the worker holds.
Unless it violates the enforcement regulations, will it be entrusted to the free will of the workers? Therefore, the lifting of the negotiations is a workforce reduction method that minimizes legal risks. If compensation terms are agreed with employees, such as three women who are legally restricted from firing, labor contracts can be lifted by the lifting of negotiations at any time.

1. The concept of the lifting of negotiations

Advantages of Dismissing Negotiation
It is highly likely that the lifting of labor contracts in a one-way way will directly lead to labor lawsuits. For this reason, it is often more likely to take a negotiating approach than a high-risk court release.

The way the negotiations are negotiated is...
1 Reasons for court release are not necessary.
2 Minimize the risk of labor disputes,
3 It is advantageous in that it can avoid legal fees and compensation for the bankruptcy.

Meanwhile, it is possible to negotiate with employees for special reasons, who are restricted from dismissal, if agreed.

[Limited Disclaimer Staff]
Female employees in women's 3rd year, employees in medical equipment due to disease injury, employees with grade 1-6 disability rating due to industrial accidents, and employees working for 15 consecutive years
Employees who are under five years of legal retirement, etc.

Payment of Economic Compensation
In Korea, the company is required to pay severance pay in whatever form it retires, but in China, there is no obligation to pay compensation to management upon retirement due to employee reasons. In other words, the cancellation of the negotiations will determine whether the economic compensation is paid or not, depending on who first raised it. When a user raises an obligation to pay economic compensation, he or she does not have to give economic compensation if the worker first raises it.

[Example] Unnecessary economic compensation payment by the company's offer of early termination of negotiations

K signed a three-year labor contract with a parent company, but after a year and a half, he was preparing to resign due to poor health conditions due to work pressure. Then the company noticed the move by K to resign and raised the lifting of the labor contract, and K agreed to it and lifted the labor contract by a negotiation match. After the cancellation of the contract, K demanded an economic compensation ban, but insisted the company could not give economic compensation because it lifted the labor contract through a consensus of negotiations.
In support of K's claim, the Labor Arbitration Commission decided to pay two months' economic compensation.

(Explain)
Although the contract has been terminated by a negotiation match, since the company first raised it, economic compensation must be paid.

[Decommission of negotiations by management offer ]

If the management wants to terminate the contract halfway before the contract expires, the user must negotiate with the worker.
If there is no reason for the lifting of the law on the part of the workers, negotiations between labor and management need to be negotiated through a tug-of-war
In the course of negotiations, the proposal for the payment of economic compensation based on years of service is basically necessary, and how much more will be added to this will depend on individual lifting situations and labor-management negotiation skills.

As the labor contract law stipulates unilateral notice of dismissal and payment of economic compensation (two times the amount of economic compensation) instead of economic compensation, the amount of the negotiation is generally determined between the minimum compensation for resignation (the legal compensation) and the maximum compensation for resignation (the maximum amount that a worker can receive as much as the economic compensation x 2 times as much as the economic compensation).

In the course of negotiations, most workers take the one-month layoff allowance for granted, but there is no legal basis for this argument. (For cancellation of negotiations, no notice of dismissal was given a month ago.) However, in order to facilitate negotiations with workers, it is often necessary to add an additional one month or so in addition to legal economic compensation.

In the event of no violation of the company, it is often agreed upon on the terms of economic compensation, such as N (service training) +1 (for promoting negotiations).
However, in the case of a company that normally has many loopholes in its labor management, it is likely that workers will use them as bargaining chips in the negotiation process (payment of overtime fees, non-payment of labor contracts, lack of social insurance, etc.). If such unfair labor practices exist in practice, the layoff course may be increased as management will be placed at a disadvantage in negotiating the termination of the contract.

[working-level measures]

There is a formal method of signing [Sample10-8] and a simple process in the form of 2 [Confirmation] when negotiating a labor contract.

If a formal proposal is made, it is highly likely that the other party will take time off by questioning the outside world in doubt about the content.
If the company is small in size, does not raise the other party's alert, and wants to quickly terminate its employment, it may be a good idea to sign a brief confirmation that states, "Work is settled and we agree that there are no more disputes."

With such confirmation, it can basically prevent any act of reversing post-retirement agreements and requiring additional compensation.

[Confirmation]
I am relieved of my labor relations with the company because of the cause of the (negotiation) cancellation. I hereby voluntarily check the details below.
1. The two sides will terminate the labor relations by a negotiation match, and the employee labor contract will be terminated after signing this confirmation.
2. After verifying the employees, the company shall pay the employees one-off compensation_____元 (including wages in the month).
3. The labor conservancy etc. has already been settled, and no other dispute exists between the two parties.

[Transferred Agreement]
The biggest advantage of the lifting of negotiations on labor contracts is not only the termination of the contract, but also the package of all potential labor dispute issues during his tenure. In addition to the economic compensation, the negotiation can be concluded neatly by inserting a package of agreements into the turnover agreement, offering one-month wages for "promoting negotiations."

(Major clauses of the relocation agreement)
ᄋ In addition to the payment of ____ in a lump sum to Eulbang a year before the end of the month, the payment of economic compensation to Eulbang due to the termination of the labor contract, and all other expenses for the compensation of the surplus to be obtained by Eulbang, the item of which is the only and all compensation for the ultimate Eobang.
Eulbang shall voluntarily give up the compensation and compensation for the portion of economic compensation lower than the legal standard and other expenses.

ᄋ Confirmation of Eulbang: During his tenure, Eulbang received full pay (e.g., overtime expenses, etc.) and there are no labor disputes, such as pay remuneration, between the two parties.
ᄋ Acceptance of Eulbang: Eulbang shall not again file any demands, arbitration or litigation with the Affiliates. For whatever reason, no arbitration or litigation shall be filed against the party to question its economic and civil responsibilities, nor shall any other economic dispute exist between the two parties.

 

2. Dispute Case When Negotiation is Dismissed

Risk of payment under legal economic compensation
If an entity proposes to negotiate a settlement, it shall pay economic compensation (Article 46 of the Labor Agreement Act). However, if the negotiation is lifted at a lower rate than the legal economic compensation standard, a labor action can be filed against the shortfall later.
However, because law enforcement agencies respect "self-government" on both sides, there is no legal risk if an employee knows the legal economic compensation standard but agrees to a lower amount than the court, i.e. if his rights are disposed of.

In the statement of the transfer, one can add to the clause, "The worker is aware of the legal economic compensation he is required to obtain, and the other party (company) has fulfilled its obligation to declare."

[Case] Decree of invalidity on the payment of economic compensation under the court

J joined a clothing manufacturer of Quang Zhou in April 2004, and the last labor contract was from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2008. In August 2008, the company offered to negotiate with J because it needed to cut its workforce due to poor management, and J agreed, and retired after signing a "Discussion of Labor Contract Negotiation Agreement" stipulating the receipt of three-month wages for economic compensation. After retirement, J filed a net claim knowing that under the Labor Contract Act, he could receive five months of economic compensation, but the company rejected the request on the grounds that the two sides had already signed an agreement in the Labor Contract Release Agreement.

(Explain)
The economic compensation money under the Labor Contract Abolition Consultation between labor and management is invalid because it violates the labor contract law's mandatory provisions. The company must give J five months' compensation. However, if the user satisfies the "notified obligation" at the conclusion of the agreement, the company does not need to pay additional economic compensation. This is because the worker is deemed to have given up his rights if the user has agreed to a lower economic compensation amount at the same time as notifying the legal economic compensation standard that the worker can receive in the agreement.

Precautions for Resolving Negotiation of Employees with Reason for dismissal
If there is a possibility of losing a case in the event of dismissal, because the company does not have sufficient evidence, the contract may be terminated by disciplinary action and pressuring the employee to resign for reasons. In this case, simply asking to resign can be strongly opposed, so it is also possible to conclude labor relations by signing the Transfer Agreement in a way that gives part of the legal economic compensation.
In this case, the Transfer Agreement effectively prevents legal risks if the workers themselves (excluding the management’s obligation to pay economic compensation) indicate that the company pays a certain amount of compensation for consideration.

[Example] Discipline and remove wrongful negotiation with the subject

S is an employee of a foreign-invested company, and one day he committed a breach of discipline and his boss was furious and could no longer work with him, and asked the Ministry of Personnel Management to dismiss him. The Ministry of Personnel Management confirmed that S's violation of discipline was not enough to punish and dispose of it, and after much consideration suggested to S that the negotiations be resolved. Originally, it was supposed to give 16,000 won in compensation, but it was wrong and thus could not give all of the compensation money, so it finally signed a consultation paper on the cancellation of the negotiations. "The two parties terminate the contract on a negotiation basis, and the entity also pays S half of the economic compensation."

(Explain)
The contents of the agreement were written against the enterprise. If S later requires additional shortfalls, the entity loses. A written agreement must be drawn up with the following raise of the lifting of the negotiations by the workers, so that they can escape from these legal risks. "As S raises the termination of labor contracts. It has reached a negotiation agreement with the entity, and the entity pays S some compensation" because the management does not have to pay economic compensation, and some compensation is paid to the entity as a consideration.

반응형

+ Recent posts